Daegele v. Kansas
This text of 375 U.S. 1 (Daegele v. Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, post, p. 3, and related cases, Mr. Justice Harlan would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be applied retroactively.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 U.S. 1, 84 S. Ct. 89, 11 L. Ed. 2d 44, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daegele-v-kansas-scotus-1963.