Cox v. Cox

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cox v. Cox. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 476
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 2016·No. SCWC-12-0000762·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000762

01-SEP-2016

02:19 PM

SCWC-12-0000762

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

BRUCE EDWARD COX, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CARLYN DAVIDSON COX, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000762; FC-DIVORCE NO. 06-1-0096)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BRUCE EDWARD COX’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Recktenwald, C.J., dissenting, with whom Nakayama, J., joins)

Upon consideration of Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce Edward Cox’s Motion for Reconsideration filed on August 25, 2016, the papers in support thereof, and the records and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 1, 2016.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

DISSENT

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion filed on August 16, 2016, I would grant the motion for reconsideration.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Cox, (haw 2016).

Cox v. Cox (Cox v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.