Cox v. Cox
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-12-0000762
12-MAR-2015
08:33 AM
SCWC-12-0000762
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
BRUCE EDWARD COX,
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CARLYN DAVIDSON COX,
Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000762; FC-D NO. 06-1-0096)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Plaintiff-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed February 27, 2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the
application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 12, 2015.
R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Cox (Cox v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.