Cox v. Cox

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cox v. Cox. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 476
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 12, 2015·No. SCWC-12-0000762·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000762

12-MAR-2015

08:33 AM

SCWC-12-0000762

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

BRUCE EDWARD COX,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CARLYN DAVIDSON COX,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000762; FC-D NO. 06-1-0096)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Plaintiff-

Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed February 27, 2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the

application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 12, 2015.

R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Cox, (haw 2015).

Cox v. Cox (Cox v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.