Cox v. Cox

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cox v. Cox. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 476
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 2015·No. SCWC-12-0000762·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000762

03-JUN-2015

01:16 PM

SCWC-12-0000762

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

BRUCE EDWARD COX, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CARLYN DAVIDSON COX, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000762; FC-D NO. 06-1-0096)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce Edward Cox’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 28, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 3, 2015.

R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Carlyn Davidson Cox, respondent pro se /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Cox, (haw 2015).

Cox v. Cox (Cox v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.