Cox v. Cox
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-12-0000762
03-JUN-2015
01:16 PM
SCWC-12-0000762
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
BRUCE EDWARD COX, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CARLYN DAVIDSON COX, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000762; FC-D NO. 06-1-0096)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce Edward Cox’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 28, 2015, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 3, 2015.
R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Carlyn Davidson Cox, respondent pro se /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Cox (Cox v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.