Cottell v. Reardon
This text of Cottell v. Reardon (Cottell v. Reardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X ADAM COTTELL, Petitioner, 22 CIVIL 1178 (VB)
-v- JUDGMENT
PATRICK REARDON,
Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 6, 2023, the R&R is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Judgment is entered accordingly and the case is closed. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Dated: New York, New York June 6, 2023
RUBY J. KRAJICK
_________________________ Clerk of Court
BY: _________________________ Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cottell v. Reardon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottell-v-reardon-nysd-2023.