Corwell v. Westchester County

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 2020
Docket7:19-cv-03049
StatusUnknown

This text of Corwell v. Westchester County (Corwell v. Westchester County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corwell v. Westchester County, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

eyec Ee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT yearend vale □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 1 “— oe □ wna Votan poate ZIARE CORWELL, i . nine ercemmnnengneteret eee Plaintiff, : eee

: WESTCHESTER COUNTY; ASSISTANT : ORDER WARDEN LAFONDA SPAULDING; : OFFICER ADAMES; OFFICER BELTRAN; : 19 CV 3049 (VB) OFFICER CARDILLO; OFFICER COZIER; : SERGEANT DAVIS; CORRECTIONAL : OFFICER MELENDEZ; and CORRECTIONAL : OFFICER SCHILLIRO, : Defendants. : a fn” Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights action against defendants Westchester County, Assistant Warden LaFonda Spaulding, Officer Adames, Officer Beltran, Officer Cardillo, Officer Cozier, Sergeant Davis, Correctional Officer (“C.O.”) Melendez, and C.O. Schilliro. (Doc. #2). On December 2, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint, and mailed to plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, copies of the motion and supporting documents. (Docs. ##23-24). Plaintiffs opposition to the motion was due December 19, 2019, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Local Civil Rule 6.1(b). Plaintiff failed to oppose the motion by December 19 or seek an extension of time in which to do so. On December 27, 2019, the Court sua sponte extended to January 17, 2020, plaintiffs time to oppose the motion to dismiss. (Doc. #32). The December 27 Order warned plaintiff, in bold and underlined font, that if plaintiff failed to respond to the motion by January 17, the motion will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed. (Id.). To date, plaintiff has failed to file an opposition to the motion or seek an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Court deems the motion fully submitted and unopposed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962), The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: January 27, 2020 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Corwell v. Westchester County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corwell-v-westchester-county-nysd-2020.