Corwell v. Westchester County
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | PS / SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | EASES □ eee eee eee ence nennennennneX WEL EPROM LLLY BELG □□ ZIARE CORWELL, ee Plant Diag V. : WESTCHESTER COUNTY; ASSISTANT : ORDER WARDEN LAFONDA SPAULDING; OFFICER ADAMES; OFFICER BELTRAN; 19 CV 3049 (VB) OFFICER CARDILLO; OFFICER COZIER; : SERGEANT DAVIS; CORRECTIONAL : OFFICER MELENDEZ; and : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCHILLIRO, : Defendants. : tt ht tt tk ht eT On December 2, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint, and mailed to plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, copies of the motion and □ supporting documents. (Docs. ##23-—24). Accordingly, plaintiffs opposition to the motion was due December 19, 2019. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Local Civil Rule 6.1(b). To date, plaintiff has failed to oppose the motion or seek an extension of time to do so. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: The Court sua sponte extends to January 17, 2020, plaintiffs time to oppose the motion to dismiss. If plaintiff fails to respond to the motion by January 17, 2020, the motion will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed. Defendants’ reply, if any, is due January 24, 2020. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: December 27, 2019 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:
Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corwell v. Westchester County (Corwell v. Westchester County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.