Copeland v. State

867 So. 2d 643, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3320, 2004 WL 515531
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2004·No. No. 4D03-676·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is appellant’s Anders appeal. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000); Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Garrett v. State, 788 So.2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), without prejudice to any right appellant has to raise issues concerning the voluntary nature of his plea in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to rule on appellant’s motion to withdraw plea. McCray v. State, 840 So.2d 274 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 851 So.2d 729 (Fla.2003).

FARMER, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copeland v. State, 867 So. 2d 643, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3320, 2004 WL 515531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 643 (Copeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flores v. State
211 So. 3d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Walker v. State
203 So. 3d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)