Cooper v. State

137 So. 3d 569, 2014 WL 1652535, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6092
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 2014·No. No. 2D13-1125·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Willie James Cooper, III, appeals the revocation of his probation and his resulting prison sentences. We affirm the revocation of his probation and his sentences without comment, but we remand for the correction of two scrivener’s errors in the order of revocation. See Senat v. State, 62 So.3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). The order states that Cooper admitted the violations and that he violated conditions “1, 2, 5, 9, [and] 11,” but the record reflects that Cooper did not admit the violations and that the trial court found Cooper in violation of condition 3 (not condition 2) ■ along with [570]*570conditions 1, 5, 9, and 11. On remand, the trial court is directed to correct the order.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. State, 137 So. 3d 569, 2014 WL 1652535, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6092 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

137 So. 3d 569 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennewitz v. State
192 So. 3d 662 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)