Cooper v. State
60 So. 3d 1137, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6955, 2011 WL 1775818
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743 →
Opinion
Edwin Cooper appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm without prejudice to Cooper’s right to exhaust all administrative remedies at the Department of Corrections with regard to any entitlement to gain time credit. See Jackson v. State, 971 So.2d 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Inasmuch as Cooper asserts a conclusory entitlement to jail credit, we affirm. See Petscher v. State, 936 So.2d 639, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (Orfinger, J., concurring specially).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. State, 60 So. 3d 1137, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6955, 2011 WL 1775818 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
60 So. 3d 1137 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Petscher v. State
936 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Jackson v. State
971 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)