Cooper v. State
503 So. 2d 971, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 745, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 455 So. 2d 588 →
Opinion
Affirmed. We believe the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of participating in a riot contrary to the provisions of section 870.01(2), Florida Statutes (1985). Appellant was shown to be part of a large and threatening crowd which had gathered at the scene of an altercation between the police and a smaller group of people and had refused police orders to disperse. In addition, appellant was shown to be armed with a fence post which he swung at a police dog as the leashed dog and an officer approached to disperse the crowd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. State, 503 So. 2d 971, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 745, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
503 So. 2d 971 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.