Cooper v. State
This text of 503 So. 2d 971 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. We believe the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of participating in a riot contrary to the provisions of section 870.01(2), Florida Statutes (1985). Appellant was shown to be part of a large and threatening crowd which had gathered at the scene of an altercation between the police and a smaller group of people and had refused police orders to disperse. In addition, appellant was shown to be armed with a fence post which he swung at a police dog as the leashed dog and an officer approached to disperse the crowd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 971, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 745, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.