Cooper v. State
480 So. 2d 235, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 75, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1985·No. No. BI-39·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s Motion for Correction of Sentence, based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement, is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. State, 480 So. 2d 235, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 75, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
480 So. 2d 235 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DAYRON CORP. AND CLAIMS CENTER v. Morehead
480 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)