Cooey v. Strickland

588 F.3d 924, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26715, 2009 WL 4545203
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2009·No. 09-4300·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active1 judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Additional separate writings may follow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooey v. Strickland, 588 F.3d 924, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26715, 2009 WL 4545203 (6th Cir. 2009).

588 F.3d 924 (Cooey v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fears v. Morgan
860 F.3d 881 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Moore v. Rees
138 F. Supp. 3d 860 (E.D. Kentucky, 2015)
Cooey v. Strickland
604 F.3d 939 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Reynolds v. Strickland
598 F.3d 300 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)