Connor v. Deas
This text of 255 A.D.2d 287 (Connor v. Deas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated June 3, 1997, which denied her motion for judgment in her favor upon the defendant’s failure to appear or answer, and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action.
[288]*288Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the dismissal of the plaintiffs action for failure to timely file proof of service pursuant to CPLR former 306-b (a) was automatic and self-executing (see, Dolson v DiPietro, 251 AD2d 535; Long v Quinn, 234 AD2d 520; Brackett v St. Mary’s Hosp., 233 AD2d 357), and that nunc pro tunc relief was not available (see, Kelly v Delaney, 248 AD2d 360; Long v Quinn, supra, at 521-522). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, there is no basis for retroactive application of the new CPLR 306-b (see, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 52; Floyd v Salamon Bros., 249 AD2d 139). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 287, 679 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connor-v-deas-nyappdiv-1998.