Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shafer v. Friedman

Shafer v. Friedman

269 A.D.2d 381, 702 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1252
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 381 (Shafer v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shafer v. Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 381, 702 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Carson, J.), dated January 6, 1999, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b and 214 to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the current version of CPLR 306-b, which became effective on January 1, 1998 (L 1997, ch 476, § 2), may not be applied retroactively (see, Matter of Ulster Hgts. Prop. v Assessor of Town of Orangetown, 261 AD2d 478; Connor v Deas, 255 AD2d 287). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and S. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connor v. Deas
255 A.D.2d 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Ulster Heights Property, Inc. v. Assessor of Orangetown
261 A.D.2d 478 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 381, 702 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shafer-v-friedman-nyappdiv-2000.