Antoine v. Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Antoine v. Patel

268 A.D.2d 546, 702 N.Y.S.2d 834, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1007

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 546 (Antoine v. Patel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antoine v. Patel, 268 A.D.2d 546, 702 N.Y.S.2d 834, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alla, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated January 12, 1999, as granted the defendant’s motion to reargue that branch of his prior motion which was to dismiss the complaint for failure to file a timely proof of service and, upon reargument, denied that branch of the motion as academic.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiff failed to timely file proof of service pursuant to CPLR former 306-b (a). Consequently, the dismissal of the plaintiff’s action was automatic and self-executing (see, Connor v Deas, 255 AD2d 287; Dolson v DiPietro, 251 AD2d 535).

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, there is no basis for the retroactive application of the current CPLR 306-b (see, Connor v Deas, supra; Floyd v Salamon Bros., 249 AD2d 139).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI