Connelly v. Commissioner
This text of 22 F. App'x 967 (Connelly v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
After reviewing the briefs of the parties and the record below, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the tax court did not err. We therefore affirm the judgment of the tax court on the basis of that court’s opinion.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connelly-v-commissioner-ca10-2001.