Home/District of Columbia/Communist Party of United States v. McGrath

Communist Party of United States v. McGrath

96 F. Supp. 47, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2397
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedFebruary 28, 1951
DocketCiv. A. 419-51
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 96 F. Supp. 47 (Communist Party of United States v. McGrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Communist Party of United States v. McGrath, 96 F. Supp. 47, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2397 (D.D.C. 1951).

Opinions

LETTS and PINE, District Judge.

The preliminary relief sought must be denied since plaintiffs have not exhausted their administrative remedies and for the further reason that the public interest is paramount to any threatened loss or damage to plaintiffs pending final determination of the case. Furthermore, the constitutional questions raised by the plaintiffs can be saved before the Board and determined upon review by the United States Court of Appeals pursuant to the direction of Congress for judicial review of the Board’s actions under the controlling statute.

Counsel will submit for settlement findings of fact and conclusions of law and appropriate order denying the issuance of preliminary injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Organization For Women v. Social Security Administration
736 F.2d 727 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
National Organization for Women v. Social Security Administration of the Department of Health & Human Services
736 F.2d 727 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Powell v. City of Anchorage
536 P.2d 1228 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1975)
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad
64 F.R.D. 337 (D. Maryland, 1974)
Doe v. Mundy
378 F. Supp. 731 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1974)
Nicholson File Company v. HK Porter Company
341 F. Supp. 508 (D. Rhode Island, 1972)
A Quaker Action Group v. Walter J. Hickel
421 F.2d 1111 (D.C. Circuit, 1969)
C. Tennant & Sons, Inc. v. New York Terminal Conference
299 F. Supp. 796 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Industrial Bank of Washington, a Corporation v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and Theodore J. Scheve
405 F.2d 1321 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Federal Maritime Commission v. Atlantic & Gulf/Panama Canal Zone
241 F. Supp. 766 (S.D. New York, 1965)
The Communist Party of the United States of America v. United States
331 F.2d 807 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
Copeland v. Secretary of State
226 F. Supp. 20 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.
367 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1961)
United States v. Pavenick
197 F. Supp. 257 (D. New Jersey, 1961)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Investment Bankers of America, Inc.
181 F. Supp. 346 (District of Columbia, 1960)
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. Brownell
232 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America Ue v. Brownell
232 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control Board
223 F.2d 531 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)
Embassy Dairy, Inc. v. Camalier
211 F.2d 41 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
Perry v. Perry
190 F.2d 601 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. Supp. 47, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/communist-party-of-united-states-v-mcgrath-dcd-1951.