Commonwealth v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Rose

64 A.3d 1072

DecidedFebruary 20, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.3d 1072 (Commonwealth v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Rose, 64 A.3d 1072 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that the PCRA court’s failure to provide notice pursuant to Pa. R.Crim.P. 907 was permissible in this case.

The Motion for Leave to File a Reply to the Answer is DENIED. It is further ordered that the trial court is directed to appoint counsel to assist Petitioner on appeal to this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that the PCRA court’s failure to provide notice pursuant to Pa. R.Crim.P. 907 was permissible in this case.

The Motion for Leave to File a Reply to the Answer is DENIED. It is further ordered that the trial court is directed to appoint counsel to assist Petitioner on appeal to this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.3d 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rose-pa-2013.