Commonwealth v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Rose

95 A.3d 274

DecidedJuly 8, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.3d 274 (Commonwealth v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Rose, 95 A.3d 274 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by the Commonwealth, is as follows:

Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding, as a matter of first impression, that [Respondent] was entitled to a reduced punishment under the ex post facto clause for a murder that he had yet to commit when the law was changed to increase the punishment prior to the victim’s death?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by the Commonwealth, is as follows:

Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding, as a matter of first impression, that [Respondent] was entitled to a reduced punishment under the ex post facto clause for a murder that he had yet to commit when the law was changed to increase the punishment prior to the victim’s death?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.3d 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rose-pa-2014.