Commonwealth v. Richardson

233 A.2d 183, 426 Pa. 419, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 587
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 8, 1967
DocketAppeal, 435
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 233 A.2d 183 (Commonwealth v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Richardson, 233 A.2d 183, 426 Pa. 419, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 587 (Pa. 1967).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On May 17, 1966 Lorenzo Richardson filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County. Richardson requested the appointment of counsel to represent him in the proceeding, but his request was not granted even though the court of quarter sessions did not find that he had means to procure his own counsel. Thereafter, Richardson’s petition was dismissed on the merits by that court and the Superior Court affirmed. Commonwealth v. Richardson, 209 Pa. Superior Ct. 740 (Case No. 1), 226 A. 2d 211 (1967) (per curiam). This is a petition for allowance of appeal from the Superior Court’s order.

. For the reasons outlined in our opinion in Commonwealth v. Hoffman (No. 1), 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (per curiam), we reverse the order of the Superior Court, vacate the order of the court of quarter sessions and remand the record to that court for appointment of counsel in compliance with §12 of the Post Conviction Hearing Act of 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, §12, 19 P.S. §1180-12 (Supp. 1966). As was the case in Hoffman, we do not reach the merits of the instant petition or the question of whether Richardson is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on Ms post-conviction petition.

The petition for allocatur is granted. The order of the Superior Court is reversed. The order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County is vacated *421 and the record remanded to that court with instructions to appoint counsel to represent Lorenzo Richardson in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Hines
430 A.2d 291 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Zaborowski
423 A.2d 1023 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. McClinton
413 A.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Bostic
380 A.2d 459 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Smith
380 A.2d 446 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Bliss
362 A.2d 365 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Jones
344 A.2d 504 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Fiero
341 A.2d 448 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Conner
341 A.2d 79 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
United States ex rel. Savage v. Rundle
309 F. Supp. 450 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1969)
Commonwealth v. Schmidt
259 A.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Commonwealth v. Walters
244 A.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Reagan
243 A.2d 458 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Jennings
242 A.2d 470 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Hoffman
240 A.2d 384 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Magee
236 A.2d 818 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Johnson
236 A.2d 805 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Jones
236 A.2d 521 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Kizer
236 A.2d 515 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Minnick
235 A.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.2d 183, 426 Pa. 419, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-richardson-pa-1967.