Commonwealth v. Jennings

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Jennings

242 A.2d 470, 212 Pa. Super. 757, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1320

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 13, 1968

DocketAppeal, No. 87

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.2d 470 (Commonwealth v. Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Jennings, 242 A.2d 470, 212 Pa. Super. 757, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1320 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam :

In accordance with the opinions of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), and Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 426 Pa. 419, 233 A. 2d 183 (1967), the record is remanded to the lower court with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Cueiam :

In accordance with the opinions of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), and Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 426 Pa. 419, 233 A. 2d 183 (1967), the record is remanded to the lower court with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.2d 470, 212 Pa. Super. 757, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-jennings-pasuperct-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack