Commonwealth v. Minnick

235 A.2d 150, 427 Pa. 399, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 497
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 14, 1967
DocketAppeal, 188
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 235 A.2d 150 (Commonwealth v. Minnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Minnick, 235 A.2d 150, 427 Pa. 399, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 497 (Pa. 1967).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellant, Steve Minnick, was after a plea of guilty ¿djudged to have committed second degree murder and sentenced to 6-12 years. No appeal from this conviction was prosecuted. His first attempt to obtain post-conviction relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, 19 P.S. §1180-1 et seq. (Supp. 1966) was unsuccessful. This appeal followed.

In his post-conviction petition Minnick checked the block on the post-conviction application form indicating that he was without funds and requested the appointment of an attorney. The court below was apparently satisfied that Minnick was in fact indigent for it granted leave to proceed “as a poor person.” However, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 427 Pa. 395, 235 A. 2d 148 (1967); Common *401 wealth v. Richardson, 426 Pa. 419, 233 A. 2d 183 (1967) and Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), appointment of counsel under §12 of the Post Conviction Hearing Act is mandatory. To effectuate this legislative mandate we must vacate the order below and remand the record to the lower court for appointment of counsel. We do not therefore treat the merits of any of appellant’s contentions.

The order of the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Payette County is vacated and the record remanded to that court with instructions to appoint counsel to represent Steve Minnick in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Dixon
439 A.2d 743 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Miller
418 A.2d 700 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Sinwell
393 A.2d 959 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Blair
369 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Adams
350 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Schmidt
259 A.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Commonwealth v. Minnick
258 A.2d 515 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.2d 150, 427 Pa. 399, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-minnick-pa-1967.