Commonwealth v. McCarthy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Commonwealth v. McCarthy

39 N.E. 800, 163 Mass. 168, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 66

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 39 N.E. 800 (Commonwealth v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 39 N.E. 800, 163 Mass. 168, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 66 (Mass. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Morton, J.

It does not appear from the exceptions that the testimony that was objected to was all that was introduced at the trial. That being so, it is manifest that we cannot say that it was inadmissible. It may have been made competent by other evidence. We do not mean to intimate that if it stood alone, it would have no tendency to show that the defendant kept a liquor nuisance in his house. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton, J.

It does not appear from the exceptions that the testimony that was objected to was all that was introduced at the trial. That being so, it is manifest that we cannot say that it was inadmissible. It may have been made competent by other evidence. We do not mean to intimate that if it stood alone, it would have no tendency to show that the defendant kept a liquor nuisance in his house. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 N.E. 800, 163 Mass. 168, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mccarthy-mass-1895.