People v. Perkins
This text of 1 Wend. 91 (People v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
We are of opinion that the verdict was irregular. The prisoner was indicted, and tried for an offence, formerly called capital. And though many of the ancient forms on trials are now dispensed with, the prisoner should have been present on receiving the verdict, so that he might have availed himself of the right of polling the jury. We advise that the verdict be set aside, and that there be a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wend. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perkins-nysupct-1828.