People v. Kohler

5 Cal. 72
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 72 (People v. Kohler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kohler, 5 Cal. 72 (Cal. 1855).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Bryan, J., concurred.

The bill of exceptions shows that after the jury retired, they returned and asked to hear read two depositions of witnesses of the defendant. The depositions were read to them, and this was done during the absence of the prisoner. The rule is familiar that the prisoner, in a case of felony, must be present during the whole of his trial; and reading evidence taken by deposition, although it was done after the jury had retired, is a part of the trial as much as any other. In favor of life, the strictest rule which has any sound reason to sustain it, will not be relaxed.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Dennis
335 P.2d 657 (California Supreme Court, 1959)
People v. Berling
251 P.2d 1017 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
People v. Isby
186 P.2d 405 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Frost v. State
142 So. 427 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
The People v. Brothers
180 N.E. 442 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1932)
Percer v. State
118 Tenn. 765 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1907)
People v. Holmes
50 P. 675 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Commonwealth v. McCarthy
40 N.E. 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
People v. Higgins
59 Cal. 357 (California Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cal. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kohler-cal-1855.