Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hill

727 A.2d 1113

DecidedApril 27, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 727 A.2d 1113 (Commonwealth v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hill, 727 A.2d 1113 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 1999, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the issue of whether the violation of Pa.R.Crim.P.Rule 1405 entities Petitioner to a discharge. Furthermore, the order of the Superior Court as it pertains to the Rule 1405 issue is vacated and this matter is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing and argument concerning the defendant’s right to relief for untimely sentencing. See Commonwealth v. Anders, — Pa. -, 725 A.2d 170 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 1999, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the issue of whether the violation of Pa.R.Crim.P.Rule 1405 entities Petitioner to a discharge. Furthermore, the order of the Superior Court as it pertains to the Rule 1405 issue is vacated and this matter is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing and argument concerning the defendant’s right to relief for untimely sentencing. See Commonwealth v. Anders, — Pa. -, 725 A.2d 170 (1999).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

727 A.2d 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hill-pa-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack