Commonwealth v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hawkins

929 A.2d 629, 593 Pa. 313, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1369

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 598 Pa. 85 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 21, 2007·No. Appeal 19 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Dickson, 591 Pa. 364, 918 A.2d 95 (2007). The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it reversed the learned trial judge, the Honorable Lillian H. Ransom[,] who for good and valid legal reasons refused to apply a minimum mandatory sentence upon [Petitioner]?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Dickson, 591 Pa. 364, 918 A.2d 95 (2007). The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it reversed the learned trial judge, the Honorable Lillian H. Ransom[,] who for good and valid legal reasons refused to apply a minimum mandatory sentence upon [Petitioner]?

Commonwealth v. Hawkins, 929 A.2d 629, 593 Pa. 313, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1369 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

929 A.2d 629 (Commonwealth v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related