Commonwealth v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hawkins

876 A.2d 365

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 20, 2005·No. 457 CAP·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the PCRA court’s opinion recommending a remand on account of the court’s failure to comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 909(B)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the order dismissing the PCRA petition is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for further- proceedings as directed by the PCRA court. See Commonwealth v. Rush, 576 Pa. 3, 838 A.2d 651 (2003); Commonwealth v. Williams, 566 Pa. 553, 782 A.2d 517 (2001).

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the PCRA court’s opinion recommending a remand on account of the court’s failure to comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 909(B)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the order dismissing the PCRA petition is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for further- proceedings as directed by the PCRA court. See Commonwealth v. Rush, 576 Pa. 3, 838 A.2d 651 (2003); Commonwealth v. Williams, 566 Pa. 553, 782 A.2d 517 (2001).

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Commonwealth v. Hawkins, 876 A.2d 365 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

876 A.2d 365 (Commonwealth v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related