Commonwealth v. Hawkins
876 A.2d 365, 583 Pa. 104, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1289
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 20, 2005·No. Appeal No. 457 CAP·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the PCRA court’s opinion recommending a remand on account of the court’s failure to comply with Pa.R.CrimP. 909(B)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the order dismissing the PCRA petition is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings as directed by the PCRA court. See Commonwealth v. Rush, 576 Pa. 3, 838 A.2d 651 (2003); Commonwealth v. Williams, 566 Pa. 553, 782 A.2d 517 (2001).
Jurisdiction is relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Hawkins, 876 A.2d 365, 583 Pa. 104, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1289 (Pa. 2005).
876 A.2d 365 (Commonwealth v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Hawkins
953 A.2d 1248 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Commonwealth v. Carson
913 A.2d 220 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)