Commonwealth v. Costa

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Costa

725 A.2d 176

DecidedMarch 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 725 A.2d 176 (Commonwealth v. Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Costa, 725 A.2d 176 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Was Petitioner rendered ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object and move for a mistrial in response to the prosecutor’s elicitation of testimony from Detective Rok concerning Petitioner’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent following his arrest?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Was Petitioner rendered ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object and move for a mistrial in response to the prosecutor’s elicitation of testimony from Detective Rok concerning Petitioner’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent following his arrest?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

725 A.2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-costa-pa-1999.