Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors

113 Mass. 208
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The complaint sufficiently designates, by way of allegation, and in the absence of any evidence of difficulty in ascertaining its identity, the situation of the place to be searched and its occupation by the claimant. Downing v. Porter, 8 Gray, 539. Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, 107 Mass. 386.

The evidence admitted to prove that the street in question was commonly known as Westminster Street, was competent and sufficient to support the complaint. Commonwealth v. Intoxicating liquors, 6 Allen, 596. Putnam v. Bond, 100 Mass. 58.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors, 113 Mass. 208 (Mass. 1873).

113 Mass. 208 (Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhodes v. State
116 S.W.2d 395 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Rose v. State
87 N.E. 103 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Metcalf v. Weed
19 A. 1091 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1889)
Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors
16 N.E. 298 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)