Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors

105 Mass. 468
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This court has no jurisdiction of the question argued until after the case shall have been finally disposed of [469]*469in the superior court. The power of that court to report a question of law arising in a criminal case can only be exercised after conviction, and “ if the defendant desires it or consents to it.” Gen. Sts. c. 173, § 8. The St. of 1869, c. 438, authorizing the superior court, “ by consent of the parties to the suit,” to report to .this court before verdict “ questions of law, whether arising upon a trial or other proceeding,” was manifestly intended to apply to civil cases only, amending in this respect the Gen. Sts. c. 115, § 6; and not to change the distinct provision of statute regulating the practice in criminal cases.

In Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, 103 Mass. 448, and Commonwealth v. Harvey, Ib. 451, this point was not brought to the notice of the court. Report dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors, 105 Mass. 468 (Mass. 1870).

105 Mass. 468 (Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Cronin
139 N.E. 647 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Commonwealth v. Blinn
106 N.E. 1026 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Smith v. Lincoln
84 N.E. 498 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Commonwealth v. Burton
67 N.E. 419 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Terry v. Brightman
129 Mass. 535 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors
107 Mass. 386 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1871)