Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors
97 Mass. 63
Opinion
No arguments or authorities are presented on behalf of the claimant, and on looking into the alleged grounds of his motion to dismiss the complaint, we cannot see that any of them are tenable. Some of them are met by the decisions referred to in the brief of the attorney general, and by Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, ante, 63, and others by the plain provisions of the statutes. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors, 97 Mass. 63 (Mass. 1867).
97 Mass. 63 (Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dupree v. State
119 S.W. 301 (Texas Supreme Court, 1909)
Rose v. State
87 N.E. 103 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
State v. Markuson
73 N.W. 82 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)
The Liquors of Horgan
18 A. 279 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1889)
Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors
16 N.E. 298 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
In Re Liquors of Fitzpatrick
11 A. 773 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1888)
Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors
113 Mass. 13 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)