Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors

105 Mass. 176
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The only question open to the claimant in this case is whether the municipal court of the city of Worcester had authority to receive the complaint and issue the warrant. This question was decided against the claimant in Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, 103 Mass. 448.

The other objections to the complaint and warrant, now urged by the claimant, are for formal defects apparent on the face thereof, and, not having been “ specifically assigned ” in his motion to quash, are not now open to him. St. 1864, c. 250, § 2, Commonwealth v. Sholes, 13 Allen, 554.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors, 105 Mass. 176 (Mass. 1870).

105 Mass. 176 (Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Langley
47 N.E. 511 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Commonwealth v. Murray
135 Mass. 530 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)