Commonwealth v. Baker

656 A.2d 116, 540 Pa. 131
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 8, 1995·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Order entered by this Court on March 28, 1995, is hereby VACATED.

The Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County dismissing Appellant’s second petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq., is hereby AFFIRMED. The issue raised by Appellant was previously litigated on direct appeal to this court, and, thus, Appellant is ineligible for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act. 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9543(3), 9544(a)(2)1

[133] ZAPPALA, J., files a concurring statement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Baker, 656 A.2d 116, 540 Pa. 131 (Pa. 1995).

656 A.2d 116 (Commonwealth v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. Horn
210 F. Supp. 2d 592 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Baker
728 A.2d 952 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
In Re Suspension of the Capital Unitary Review Act
722 A.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)