Commonwealth v. Baker

722 A.2d 1028, 555 Pa. 33, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 118
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 20, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 722 A.2d 1028 (Commonwealth v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Baker, 722 A.2d 1028, 555 Pa. 33, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 118 (Pa. 1999).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

Justice CASTILLE files a dissenting statement in which Justice NEWMAN joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. DeBlase
665 A.2d 427 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Stout v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
421 A.2d 1047 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Smith v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
683 A.2d 278 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 A.2d 1028, 555 Pa. 33, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-baker-pa-1999.