Commonwealth, Department of Education, Scotland School for Veterans' Children v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

578 A.2d 78, 134 Pa. Commw. 80, 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 382
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 17, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 578 A.2d 78 (Commonwealth, Department of Education, Scotland School for Veterans' Children v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth, Department of Education, Scotland School for Veterans' Children v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 578 A.2d 78, 134 Pa. Commw. 80, 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 382 (Pa. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

OPINION

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge.

Scotland School for Veterans’ Children (Scotland School)1 appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order upholding a referee’s decision to grant benefits to Sylvia Williams. We affirm.

Williams was employed as a houseparent during the School’s 1987 and 1988 academic years. At the completion of the 1987 academic term in June, Williams accepted limited duty for the summer of 1987. In addition, Williams applied for benefits for the summer weeks she did not work. The Office of Employment Security denied benefits. The referee awarded benefits, however, determining that [82]*82Williams was a year-round employee. The Board affirmed the referee’s decision.

On appeal, Scotland School argues that Williams had a reasonable assurance of returning to work as a houseparent in 1988 and therefore was not entitled to benefits under Section 402.1(2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,2 which provides:

(2) With respect to services performed in [a non-academic capacity] for an educational institution, benefits shall not be paid on the basis of such services to any individual for any week which commences during a period between two successive academic years or terms if such individual performs such services in the first of such academic years or terms and there is a reasonable assurance that such individual will perform such services in the second of such academic years or terms.

In this case, the referee concluded that Williams was employed as a year-round employee and thus did not fall within that category of employees who are denied benefits under Section 402.1(2). We agree.

Our General Assembly saw fit to disqualify school employees from receiving benefits during summer and other term breaks. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 496 Pa. 620, 437 A.2d 1213 (1981). It is settled law that teachers and other school employees not working during term breaks who can reasonably expect to return are not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. DeLuca v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 74 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 80, 459 A.2d 62 (1983).

The record shows that Williams performed houseparent services full-time during the normal regular school year, alternating shifts every five weeks. Williams was also [83]*83scheduled as much as possible during the summer session, when the number of students decreased from over 300 to 100. During the summer Williams continued her duties for those students who resided at Scotland year-round, and her schedule consisted of full-time weeks with little or no work the following week. (R. 16a.) The evidence of regular (though not full-time) summer scheduling, supports the finding that she was not an employee of the academic year but was employed year-round, and obviates any further discussion on the “reasonable assurance” doctrine of Section 402.1(2).

Scotland additionally argues that summer work was offered on an “as needed” basis with no agreement as to availability or continuity of such employment and thus Williams was not entitled to unemployment benefits. However, the Board’s findings of availability for full-time work is supported by substantial record evidence and as such is binding upon this appellate court. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351, 378 A.2d 829 (1977).

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the decision of the Board awarding benefits to Williams.

ORDER

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review decision, No. B-274854 dated July 13, 1989, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M. Costigan v. UCBR
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2025
Rose Tree Media S.D. v. UCBR
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2023
B. Prunty v. UCBR
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Glassmire v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
856 A.2d 269 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Croft v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
662 A.2d 24 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Scotland School v. Unemp. Comp. Bd.
578 A.2d 78 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 A.2d 78, 134 Pa. Commw. 80, 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-department-of-education-scotland-school-for-veterans-pacommwct-1990.