Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King

694 N.E.2d 79, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1418, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1559

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 21, 1998

Docket98-423

StatusPublished

This text of 694 N.E.2d 79 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King, 694 N.E.2d 79, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1418, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1559 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

On May 11, 1998, respondent filed a motion to strike relator’s answer brief filed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(8). Whereas respondent’s motion is, in substance, a reply brief to relator’s answer brief, and there is no provision under Gov.Bar R. V(8) for the filing of a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to strike relator’s answer brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On May 11, 1998, respondent filed a motion to strike relator’s answer brief filed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(8). Whereas respondent’s motion is, in substance, a reply brief to relator’s answer brief, and there is no provision under Gov.Bar R. V(8) for the filing of a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to strike relator’s answer brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 N.E.2d 79, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1418, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-king-ohio-1998.