Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King
702 N.E.2d 862, 84 Ohio St. 3d 174, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3270
Opinions
We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we disagree with the board’s recommenda[177] tions. We suspend King for one-year and stay the suspension on condition that, during the probation period, he work with a mentor appointed by relator. We suspend Pope for six months and stay the suspension. Costs taxed to respondents.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King, 702 N.E.2d 862, 84 Ohio St. 3d 174, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3270 (Ohio 1998).
702 N.E.2d 862 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Brockler
2016 Ohio 657 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer
2003 Ohio 6649 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Columbus Bar Association v. King
2002 Ohio 1945 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. King
1998 Ohio 528 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)