Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1601
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 25, 1918
DocketNo. 728
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 246 U.S. 653 (Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co., 246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1601 (1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726; (2) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S., 185; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Damiano v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
161 F.2d 534 (Third Circuit, 1947)
Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.
102 S.W.2d 903 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1937)
Keith v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
132 So. 223 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
276 F. 337 (Fifth Circuit, 1921)
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Echols
84 So. 827 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence
251 U.S. 535 (Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collard-v-pittsburgh-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-scotus-1918.