Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
This text of 246 U.S. 653 (Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726; (2) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S., 185; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collard-v-pittsburgh-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-scotus-1918.