Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence

Supreme Court

Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence

251 U.S. 535, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 401, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1809

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 1919·No. No. 183; No. 184; No. 185·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19; and see Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co., 246 U. S. 653. Petitions for certiorari denied. Mr. Robert H. McCarter, Mr. J. Jerome Hahn, Mr. Francis I. McCanna and Mr. Alfred G. Chaffee for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Albert A. Baker and Mr. Elmer S. Chace for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19; and see Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co., 246 U. S. 653. Petitions for certiorari denied. Mr. Robert H. McCarter, Mr. J. Jerome Hahn, Mr. Francis I. McCanna and Mr. Alfred G. Chaffee for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Albert A. Baker and Mr. Elmer S. Chace for defendants in error.

Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence, 251 U.S. 535, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 401, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1809 (1919).

Pincite

251 U.S. 535 (Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related