Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State

595 So. 2d 1117, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4137, 1992 WL 69032
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 300 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1992·No. No. 92-0408·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After review of the record and initial brief, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order summarily, pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.. This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the trial court to withdraw his plea. See Meredith v. State, 508 So.2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fox v. State, 510 So.2d 310, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Jolly v. State, 392 So.2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).

DOWNEY, LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 595 So. 2d 1117, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4137, 1992 WL 69032 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 1117 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jolly v. State
392 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Williams v. State
316 So. 2d 267 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Meredith v. State
508 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Fox v. State
510 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)