Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State

616 So. 2d 640, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1993 WL 130950
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 300 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1993·No. No. 93-0946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion, inter alia, as being untimely filed. Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 616 So. 2d 640, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1993 WL 130950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 640 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paez v. State
512 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)