Coleman v. State

616 So. 2d 640, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1993 WL 130950
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1993
DocketNo. 93-0946
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 640 (Coleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. State, 616 So. 2d 640, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1993 WL 130950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion, inter alia, as being untimely filed. Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paez v. State
512 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 640, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1993 WL 130950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.