Coleman v. State
548 So. 2d 869, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2158, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4978, 1989 WL 104145
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 300 →
Opinion
We affirm the conviction and sentence but reverse imposition of costs, which were assessed without first giving appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988). We remand for striking of costs, without prejudice to the state filing a proper motion to tax costs in accordance with the procedure outlined in Jenkins.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. State, 548 So. 2d 869, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2158, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4978, 1989 WL 104145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
548 So. 2d 869 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)