Cole v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cole v. State

288 S.W.3d 332, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2009 WL 2151383

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 21, 2009

DocketED 91263

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 S.W.3d 332 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. State, 288 S.W.3d 332, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2009 WL 2151383 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lance Cole appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential *333 purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lance Cole appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential *333 purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 S.W.3d 332, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2009 WL 2151383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack