Cole v. State

352 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2011 WL 5362086
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cole v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2011·No. ED 96224·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Cole appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Weeks v. State, 140 S.W.3d 39, 44 (Mo.banc 2004). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. State, 352 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2011 WL 5362086 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

352 S.W.3d 410 (Cole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weeks v. State
140 S.W.3d 39 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2004)