Cole v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cole v. State

352 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2011 WL 5362086

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2011

DocketED 96224

StatusPublished

This text of 352 S.W.3d 410 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. State, 352 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2011 WL 5362086 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Cole appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Weeks v. State, 140 S.W.3d 39, 44 (Mo.banc 2004). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Cole appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Weeks v. State, 140 S.W.3d 39, 44 (Mo.banc 2004). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2011 WL 5362086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack