BILAUSKI v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

BILAUSKI v. State

288 S.W.3d 332, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2009 WL 2151376

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 21, 2009

DocketED 91723

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 S.W.3d 332 (BILAUSKI v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BILAUSKI v. State, 288 S.W.3d 332, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2009 WL 2151376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard S. Bilauski (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues he was denied effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI