Cole v. State
This text of 474 So. 2d 1267 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no merit in any of the appellant’s points which concern the multiple convictions below. California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981); United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849, 103 S.Ct. 109, 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Parker v. State, 421 So.2d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hernandez v. State, 323 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Cole’s sentences are modified so that the three-year minimum mandatory provisions imposed under section 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1981) are to run concurrently rather than consecutively. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); State v. Ames, 467 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1985); Wilson v. State, 467 So.2d 996 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 So. 2d 1267, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2108, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.