Cole v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cole v. State

482 So. 2d 583, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6198

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1986

DocketNo. 85-402

StatusPublished

This text of 482 So. 2d 583 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. State, 482 So. 2d 583, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6198 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Chief Judge.

We reject appellant’s arguments relating to his convictions, as they are without merit. However, appellant’s argument relating to his sentences are well taken. Because the trial court departed from the recommended guideline sentence without providing written reasons for departure, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing, as required by State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Chief Judge.

We reject appellant’s arguments relating to his convictions, as they are without merit. However, appellant’s argument relating to his sentences are well taken. Because the trial court departed from the recommended guideline sentence without providing written reasons for departure, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing, as required by State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 So. 2d 583, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack