Cole v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cole v. State

482 So. 2d 583, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6198

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cole v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 521 So. 2d 297 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1986·No. No. 85-402·Published

Opinion

COBB, Chief Judge.

We reject appellant’s arguments relating to his convictions, as they are without merit. However, appellant’s argument relating to his sentences are well taken. Because the trial court departed from the recommended guideline sentence without providing written reasons for departure, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing, as required by State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Chief Judge.

We reject appellant’s arguments relating to his convictions, as they are without merit. However, appellant’s argument relating to his sentences are well taken. Because the trial court departed from the recommended guideline sentence without providing written reasons for departure, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing, as required by State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cole v. State, 482 So. 2d 583, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6198 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

482 So. 2d 583 (Cole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related